Global assessment of human influence on modelling of bird invasions

Study demonstrates that incorporating variables measuring human impact in distribution models significantly increases accuracy of predictions

通过 GBIF 使用的数据资源 : 395,161,334 species occurrences
Callonetta leucophrys
Callonetta leucophrys (Vieillot, 1816) observed in South Africa by tjeerd (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Species distribution modelling (SDM) is a powerful tool used to estimate the invasion potential of alien species in adventive regions—areas where species have been introduced but are not yet fully established. Often based solely on macroclimatic variables, however, SDMs may overlook other conditions allowing alien species to overcome limitations imposed by broad-scale climate.

In this study, researchers explored the effect of human influence on niche conservatism and shifts by comparing native and alien distributions of 150 bird species using SDM predictions based on eight bioclimatic variables (e.g. temperature, precipitation, etc.) and/or two human impact variables: the Global Human Influence index, and, degree of urbanization.

The performance of SDMs improved significantly with the addition of human impact variables as opposed to bioclimatic variables alone. For most species, the native and alien niches were similar both in terms of climate and human impact, however, some alien expansions were registered—mostly involving colonization of colder climates and more disturbed environments.

In addition to highlighting the importance of human influence on modelling distributions of invasive species, the overall results showed that alien birds tend to invade areas with similar climatic and human impact conditions to their native range. When differences in niches are observed, these are typically related to species tolerance to human-modified habitats and time since introduction.

Cardador L and Blackburn TM (2020) A global assessment of human influence on niche shifts and risk predictions of bird invasions. Global Ecology and Biogeography. Wiley 29(11): 1956–1966. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13166