Florida Museum Environmental Archaeology Baptizing Springs Zooarchaeological Data
Citation
Emery K, LeFebvre M (2021). Florida Museum Environmental Archaeology Baptizing Springs Zooarchaeological Data. Version 1.11. University of Florida Environmental Archaeology. Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/kvapvf accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-11-03.Description
Florida Museum Environmental Archaeology zooarchaeological specimen records from the Baptizing Spring site.Purpose
Description of the zooarchaeological analysis of specimen records from the Baptizing Spring site.
Sampling Description
Study Extent
From Loucks 1979: “The Baptizing Spring site covers an estimated 2.83 HA which includes Baptizing Spring in the northeast corner” (119). (See Figure 6) Loucks, L.J. (1979) Political and Economic Interactions between Spaniards and Indians: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Perspectives of the Mission System in Florida. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Sampling
Information and Excerpts from Loucks 1979, see also Appendix A (Excavation Data and Detailed Feature Descriptions) 1976 Excavations: Site limits were determined via “ ‘posthole’ testing and surface observations” (page118). “A total of 346 square meters was excavated in four portions of the site: (1) Group A, (2) Group B, (3) Group C, and (4) two two-meter wide trenches south and southeast of Group A” (page 119). Structure A was in Group B, and Structure B in Group A. Group C was the “Indian sector” of the site and included four 3x3 m square test units. In an effort to locate a cemetery, 180 posthole tests and a trench were excavated north of Structure A. “All excavated dirt from Structures A and C were sifted through mechanical shaker screens outfitted with wide gauge (3/8” by ¾”) diamond mesh. Trench and Structure B materials were not screened. Contents of Structure C features were screened through 1/8” by 1/8” fine screen or were simply troweled carefully” (page 120-121). (See also Heath 1977) 1978 Excavations: Based on 1976 excavations, additional units and a one meter wide trench were excavated (See Figures 6, 7). “A total of 197 square meters were investigated across the site. With some exceptions, all excavated soil was screened through ¼” by ¼” hardware cloth over expanded diamond mesh on mechanical shaker screens. Parts of Trench #1 and all of Trench #6 (Figure 7) were screened through 3/8” by ¾” expanded diamond mesh [on a stand when the mechanical shaker was not working]…Bagged contents from five features were water screened through fine mesh (1/1” by 1/16”) during later analysis.” (page 122). Three Zones were established (pages125-126): Zone I: IA) litter/root zone, IB) grey, greyish tan or tan with grey and brown mottling, IC) leaching zone from IB to Zone II Zone II: culturally sterile zone with features extending into sterile soil, dark to light tan Zone III: clay or clayey sand that was not excavated Zone IV: only located in a deep feature in one specific square 443N 547 E, almost white sand and no cultural materials, was between Zone II and a limestone/clay substrate Loucks, L.J. (1979) Political and Economic Interactions between Spaniards and Indians: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Perspectives of the Mission System in Florida. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Quality Control
n/aMethod steps
- n/a
Additional info
Information and excerpts from Loucks (1979): Zooarchaeological Analysis (from Loucks 1979: 221-232; Tables 11, 12) Cynthia Heath analyzed the 1976 sample. Arlene Fradkin analyzed the 1978 sample. Loucks also analyzed for evidence of butchering and “some re-identification” (page 221). Overall, the faunal remains are described as fragmentary and demineralized (page 212). The majority of faunal remains are from vertebrate taxa, followed by a few identified invertebrate specimens (Table 11). Screening of faunal materials was not consistent across site areas or features. “There is little doubt that failure to screen the 1976 trenches and all materials from Structure A introduced some bias into the sample even if no bone was missed in the excavation since the possibility always exists that some was. Additionally, only fine screening of features would have recovered very small bones, fish scales, etc. Fortunately, the majority of the features were fine screened although portions of large 1978 features were only screened using regular mesh (1/4”by ¼” on 3/8” by ¾” expanded mesh). Even using this larger sized mesh, minute bone fragments were recovered (about .25 square centimeter). If small bones such as fish vertebrae were encountered when reaming out features, the entire feature contents were bagged and returned to the lab for water screening through fine mesh. It is fortunate, however, that recovery techniques were inconsistent with the goal of recovering all faunal remains.” (Loucks 1979: 121). Zooarchaeological specimen identification took place at the Florida Museum using the zooarchaeological comparative skeletal collection. When possible, bones were identified to the level of genus or species, or the next ascending category. “Miscellaneous bone” was used for fragments not identifiable to finer taxonomic resolution. Heath (1977) calculated weight via “contributions of different faunal groups as well as raw numbers of fragments, relative frequencies, and MNI” (page 222). The bone from the 1978 excavations were not weighed. Loucks, L.J. (1979) Political and Economic Interactions between Spaniards and Indians: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Perspectives of the Mission System in Florida. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.Taxonomic Coverages
All zooarchaeological specimens identified to phylum, class, order, genus, or species.
-
Animaliarank: kingdom
Geographic Coverages
Near Luraville in Suwannee County, Florida.
Bibliographic Citations
- Heath, C.M. (1977) A Comparative Study of Spanish and Indian Subsistence at the Baptizing Spring Site, 8-Su-65. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville. -
- Loucks, L.J. (1978) Suwannee County Survey Report, Fall 1977: An Account of Sites Located on Property Owned by Owens-Illinois, Inc. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville. -
- Loucks, L.J. (1979) Political and Economic Interactions between Spaniards and Indians: Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Perspectives of the Mission System in Florida. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville. -
- Loucks, J.L. (1991) Spanish-Indian Interaction on the Florida Missions: The Archaeology of Baptizing Spring. Florida Anthropologist 44(2-4):204-213. -
- Loucks, L.J. (1993) Spanish-Indian Interaction on the Florida Missions: The Archaeology of Baptizing Spring. In the The Spanish Missions of La Florida (B.G. McEwan, ed.) 193-216. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. -
Contacts
Kitty Emeryoriginator
position: Curator
Florida Museum of Natural History
Gainesville
32611
Florida
US
Telephone: 352-273-1919
email: kemery@flmnh.ufl.edu
homepage: http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/envarch/home/
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-1968
Michelle LeFebvre
metadata author
position: Postdoctoral Fellow
Florida Museum of Natural History
1659 Museum Rd
Gainesville
32611
Florida
US
email: mlefebvre@flmnh.ufl.edu
Laura Brenskelle
user
email: lbrensk@gmail.com
L. Jill Loucks
principal investigator
Jerald Milanich
principal investigator
position: Florida Archaeology Curator, Emeritus
Florida Museum
Gainesville
32611
FL
US
Cynthia Heath
author
Arlene Fradkin
author
position: Associate Professor
Florida Atlantic University
777 Glades Road, SO171
Boca Raton
33431
FL
US
Telephone: 561-297-3231
email: afradkin@fau.edu
Kitty Emery
administrative point of contact
position: Curator
Florida Museum of Natural History
Gainesville
32611
Florida
US
Telephone: 352-273-1919
email: kemery@flmnh.ufl.edu
homepage: http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/envarch/home/
userId: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-1968